Skip to content
CaseParity

Virginia public records · 2019–2024 · Va. Code § 18.2-250

What the Virginia sentencing record shows for Possession of controlled substances unlawful in the 20th Judicial Circuit

142 sentencing records from the 20th Judicial Circuit (2019–2024) with Va. Code § 18.2-250 as the primary offense.

Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission data · 2019–2024 · Guideline compliance · Primary offenses only

How Va. Code § 18.2-250 sentences compared to the guidelines in the 20th Judicial Circuit

Above guideline range

16.5%

Record count

142

VA circuits reporting

29 of 31

Guideline compliance — 20th Judicial Circuit

Above guideline rangeEffective sentence exceeded gl_high_months
16.5%
Within guideline rangeEffective sentence between gl_low and gl_high
46.8%
Below guideline rangeEffective sentence below gl_low_months
36.7%

Based on 79 of 142 guideline-eligible records · effective sentence reconstructed (fully-suspended = 0 months) · guideline range per Va. Code § 19.2-298.01 · primary offenses only

How these rates are computed

Guideline-compliance rates use the reconstructed effective sentence: a fully-suspended sentence counts as 0 months (below the guideline range), never as a missing value. This matches the methodology of the full CaseParity report and prevents overstating the share of sentences at or above the guideline range. Rates are computed only over records with a guideline range on file.

This page groups records by the exact code section as recorded, including subsection variants. A purchased report analyzes at the base-section level, so its cohort scope can differ slightly from this page.

How long were the sentences

Median effective sentence

3 mo

Middle 50% (IQR)

0 mo – 1.0 yr

Plea rate

52.8%

Effective sentence = active time to serve, reconstructed (a fully-suspended sentence counts as 0 months). Half of records fall inside the IQR range. Plea rate = share of records with a plea agreement.

What this page does not tell you

It does not tell you why a sentence fell above or below the range: plea posture, offense specifics and criminal history all move it, and none are in the aggregate record.

How the 20th Judicial Circuit compares with the rest of Virginia

In the 20th Judicial Circuit, 16.5% of Va. Code § 18.2-250 sentences exceeded the guideline range. That ranks 2nd of 29 Virginia circuits reporting at least 10 records for Va. Code § 18.2-250. Across those circuits the above-guideline rate runs 0% to 25%, median 4.1%. Within-Virginia variation in the public record, not a comparison of judicial practices or a prediction.

Circuit 20
16.5%

Bar width = above-guideline rate (0–100 %) · 29 circuits with ≥ 10 records · 2019–2024

Within-Virginia variation in the public record — not a comparison of judicial practices or a prediction about any individual case.

The full report goes deeper

Statute text as of the offense date, version-aware sourcing, and the full guideline compliance breakdown — one report, verified against primary sources.

Get the full report →

One-time purchase · price shown by charge severity before payment — never a surprise.

The statute

Read the current text of Va. Code § 18.2-250 at law.lis.virginia.gov. Statutes are amended; check the version in effect on the offense date. Va. Code § 18.2-250 at law.lis.virginia.gov →

Counties & cities in the 20th Judicial Circuit

Other code sections in the 20th Judicial Circuit

CaseParity · Virginia · 20th Judicial Circuit · Va. Code § 18.2-250

16.5%above guideline range

142 Virginia sentencing records (2019–2024) for Va. Code § 18.2-250 in the 20th Judicial Circuit. One point in the documented range across 29 qualifying circuits. Within-Virginia comparison only.

Source: Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission · guideline range per Va. Code § 19.2-298.01 · documented outcomes, not a prediction

See the full report for this offense.Get this report
Friend saves 10%: SHARE10

Shared posts carry their source and a note that CaseParity publishes public records — not legal advice.

CaseParity takes no position on sentencing policy. We do not advocate for longer sentences or shorter ones. We do not favor any party, any side, or any outcome. We publish the record.

Past sentencing patterns do not predict future outcomes in any individual case. CaseParity does not recommend litigation strategy, plea decisions, sentencing positions, or appellate arguments. Sentencing outcomes reflect many factors not captured in structured public records.

CaseParity is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Statistics are computed from anonymized public sentencing records and describe historical patterns only. They do not predict outcomes in any individual case. Source: Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission. Guideline range per Va. Code § 19.2-298.01. Primary offenses only.

← All Virginia code sections