Florida
3.2M casesSentencing data by charge for all 66 counties with court records — felony and misdemeanor, from Clerk of Courts data.
charge × county · 2018–2026 · Florida Clerks of Court
STATEWIDE: FLORIDA · VIRGINIA | IN DEPTH: COOK COUNTY, IL · HARRIS COUNTY, TX
Sentencing data by charge, county, and court.
The law tells you the rules. The record shows the outcomes. Court records are public — but public doesn’t mean visible. CaseParity turns official case records into sentencing data you can actually read: statewide across Florida and Virginia, in depth for Cook County and Harris County — two of the nation’s largest county court systems — organized by charge and county, with every number sourced.
No names. No case numbers. No case facts required.
- 11M+ source records
- 4 jurisdictions
- 1,000+ statutes & offense categories
- named official sources
CaseParity is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Documented outcomes — not a prediction of any case.
10.6M+
documented cases published
DERIVE-AT-BUILD · published cases only
66 counties
Florida, statewide, every charge with records
FL CLERKS OF COURT · 2018–2026
31 + 128
Virginia circuits + cities/counties, guidelines compliance
VCSC · 1995–2023
2
major county systems in depth: Cook & Harris
CCSAO · HARRIS DIST. CLERK
Coverage
What’s in the record
Virginia
103K casesSentencing guidelines compliance — within, above, or below the recommended range — by code section, judicial circuit, and city or county.
section × circuit × locality · 1995–2023 · Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission
Cook County, Illinois
3.1M casesCase outcomes by charge from State's Attorney felony records for the Chicago metro's courts.
charge · 2010–2024 · Cook County State's Attorney
Harris County, Texas
4.1M casesOutcomes by charge from District Clerk records for the Houston metro's courts.
charge · 2010–2026 · Harris County District Clerk
Volumes are case-, charge-, or sentencing-event-level as noted per jurisdiction and are not necessarily unique defendants. Each jurisdiction’s record is analyzed on its own grain against its own source — figures are never summed or compared across jurisdictions. Figures verified against production data 2026-07-27.
Start with three inputs — not personal case facts.
No names, no case numbers, no facts about anyone’s conduct. The charge selector describes the historical cohort in the public record — it does not evaluate or classify anyone’s case.
1 · Filed charge
The statute or offense category, as charged.
2 · Jurisdiction
The county, court, or circuit where the case was filed.
3 · Offense date
So figures match the statute as it read on that date — not today's text — where the source and charge mapping support it.
For attorneys
Save the hours — the full documented record for the selected charge, not the handful of cases you'd find by hand.
- Statute matching — figures matched to the statute version in effect on the offense date
- Court- and judge-level detail where the record provides it
- Source-linked methodology behind every figure, version-stamped
For individuals & families
See what the historical record shows without entering personal details.
- No names, no case numbers, no facts about anyone's conduct required
- Transparent one-time pricing, shown before payment
- Historical context from documented outcomes — never a prediction about any individual case
The report
What you receive
Disposition patterns
How the charge was resolved in the record — conviction, withheld adjudication, dismissal, and other recorded dispositions, in aggregate.
Sentencing information
Recorded sentence types and length distributions for the charge, where the source supports it.
Local variation
How recorded outcomes differ by county, court, or judge where reporting thresholds are met. Comparisons remain within the selected jurisdiction and do not establish why recorded outcomes differ.
Named sources & statute history
Every reported figure is derived from and traceable to a named government source, matched to the applicable historical statute version where the source and charge mapping support it.
From the record
A documented example from each jurisdiction
Each example is computed within its own jurisdiction, on its own record — the figures are never compared across jurisdictions.
Florida
Fla. Stat. § 893.13(6)(a) — Possession of a controlled substance
118,544 recorded cases for this charge · 2018–2026 · statewide
72.5%
Adjudicated guilty
20.5%
Adjudication withheld
1.4%
Dismissed / acquitted
25.8%
Prison sentence
49.9%
County jail sentence
13.2%
Probation
Disposition shares are of all recorded cases; sentence shares are of the 85,902 adjudicated-guilty cases with a final sentence (excludes 453 pending sentencing).
Harris County, Texas
Tex. H&S Code § 481.115 — Possession of Controlled Substance PG-1
134,721 qualifying charges for this statute · 2010–2024 · 31 district courts with reportable records
32.6%
Convicted
34.4%
Dismissed
30.4%
Deferred adjudication
134,721 qualifying charges for this statute pooled across 31 district courts with reportable records — a subset of the full Harris County corpus.
Also documented: Cook County, Illinois — 720 ILCS 570/402(c) — Possession of a controlled substance ▸
95,338 recorded charges · 2011–2024 · county-wide
38.8%
Found guilty (plea, bench, or jury)
59.2%
Nolle / dropped
47.9%
Prison sentence
50.3%
Probation
Disposition shares are of all recorded charges; sentence shares are of the sentenced cohort. Disposition over 95,338 § 402(c) charges in the CCSAO felony-disposition feed (2011–2024): 36,952 guilty, 56,460 nolle/SOL. Sentence type & length shown for the 29,639 cases that reached sentencing (~31% of the funnel; ~80% of guilty dispositions). INITIATION intake feed excluded — it is not an outcome.
Also documented: Virginia — Va. Code § 18.2-95 — Grand larceny ▸
5,764 sentencing events · 1995–2023 · circuits 1–31
81.7%
Sentence within the guideline range
10.6%
Below the guideline range
7.7%
Above the guideline range
Guideline-versus-imposed concurrence over 2,540 concurrence-coded events — the Sentencing Guidelines dataset covers sentencing events, not full case dispositions. 5,764 larceny (§ 18.2-95) sentencing events, circuits 1–31 (9 events in uncoded circuit 99 excluded). VCSC concurrence field recorded for 2,540 (3,224 not calculated or missing worksheet). Sentence length: larceny-only single-offense events with active time (eff_recon > 0). Data snapshot: 2026-05-29.
Historical aggregates from the public record — not a prediction of any case.
Free pages vs. the full report
Full report
Outcome snapshot for the charge
Full county analysis for the charge
Basic disposition rates
Sentence-length distributions, where the source supports it
Summary metrics
Trends over time, where the source supports it
Limited geography
County, court, and judge-level detail, where the source supports it
General source note
Full source & methodology documentation
Web view
Downloadable PDF
Full report: $99 misdemeanor · $199 felony — downloadable PDF · one-time purchase · 14-day money-back guarantee.
◦ We collect nothing about you
No name, no case number, no facts of any case. There is nothing to share, because we never have it.
◦ Sourced and shown, always
Each figure names its government source, window, and case count. Small cohorts are shown, never hidden; rates appear only where the data supports them.
◦ Machine-readable
Published tables are also available as JSON (dataset.json) for research and AI systems.
CaseParity makes the criminal-court record visible.
Named sources
Every reported figure is derived from and traceable to a named government source, version-stamped.
Published methodology
How every metric is built is documented and public. Read the methodology
Statute-version aware
Figures are matched to the applicable historical statute version where the source and charge mapping support it.
Reporting thresholds
Small-sample figures are withheld, never guessed or extrapolated.
Privacy by design
No names, no case numbers, no case facts required.
Built from public government data. CaseParity uses government-published court and sentencing records available under the applicable source program, public-access framework, or records law. Availability varies by jurisdiction, record type, date, and confidentiality restrictions. CaseParity does not provide person lookup and does not identify individuals.
The deliverable
Every reported figure is derived from and traceable to a named public source.
Included in the full report — where the free pages stop:
by courthouseby judge (Cook)sentence-length percentilesstatute text on the case dateyear-by-year trend
Pricing
Transparent, shown before payment
Single report
$99 misdemeanor · $199 felony
Downloadable PDF · one-time purchase · 14-day money-back guarantee.
Attorney Pro
$399/mo
12-month term · $549/mo month-to-month
4 attorney-tier reports per billing period · for licensed, bar-verified attorneys.
Full details on the pricing page.
Coming soon
◦ Federal courts
U.S. District Court sentencing records. On the roadmap.
◦ North Carolina
Statewide criminal sentencing records. On the roadmap.
◦ Minnesota
Statewide criminal sentencing records. On the roadmap.
◦ More Texas counties
Additional counties beyond Harris. Source integration in progress. Texas court data is county-by-county, not statewide.
Don’t see your county or state? Request one ›
Check whether your charge and jurisdiction are covered.
The record is public. We make it visible.
CaseParity is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Documented outcomes — not a prediction of any case.
▸ All documented sentencing outcomes — full data by jurisdiction, county, circuit, court & judge (text)
The complete public-record dataset behind the interactive explorer above, rendered as text for search engines and reference. Counts are shown for every unit; Cook County judge rates publish at N≥100. Documented past outcomes — not a prediction about any case. CaseParity is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.
Florida — Fla. Stat. § 893.13(6)(a) — Possession of a controlled substance
Florida · 893.13.6a · 2018–2026 · 23 counties
Statewide / all counties
Statewide / all counties — 118,544 cases
Across Statewide / all counties, county jail averaged 5 mo (median 4 mo; half fall between 1 mo and 7 mo); state prison terms were longer (average 2.8 yr).
| Sentence type | Cases | Median | Average | Middle 50% | Most-common band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State prison | 22,120 | 2.1 yr | 2.8 yr | 18 mo–3.8 yr | 36–60 mo (39%) |
| County jail | 42,880 | 4 mo | 5 mo | 1 mo–7 mo | 6–12 mo (32%) |
| Probation | 11,321 | 2.0 yr | 2.3 yr | 18 mo–3.0 yr | 24–36 mo (35%) |
Median, average, and the middle 50% are exact percentiles (PERCENTILE_CONT) over recorded lengths. Sentence lengths are capped per methodology; only cases with a recorded length are counted. Documented past outcomes — not a prediction about any case.
| county | Recorded cases | Median confinement (months) |
|---|---|---|
| Bay | 4,676 | 2.0 yr |
| Broward | 1,681 | 20 mo |
| Charlotte | 2,463 | 3.0 yr |
| Citrus | 3,112 | 2.0 yr |
| Clay | 2,144 | 22 mo |
| Escambia | 10,803 | 2.0 yr |
| Flagler | 247 | 22 mo |
| Gadsden | 61 | — |
| Indian River | 2,097 | 2.5 yr |
| Lee | 6,843 | 3.0 yr |
| Leon | 2,101 | 2.5 yr |
| Martin | 2,292 | 3.3 yr |
| Miami-Dade | 14,078 | 2.0 yr |
| Okaloosa | 2,863 | 2.0 yr |
| Orange | 10,787 | 23 mo |
| Osceola | 1,625 | 2.0 yr |
| Pasco | 11,725 | 2.3 yr |
| Polk | 3,916 | 2.0 yr |
| Sarasota | 8,492 | 2.5 yr |
| Seminole | 5,450 | 2.2 yr |
| St. Johns | 3,066 | 2.0 yr |
| St. Lucie | 3,995 | 2.2 yr |
| Volusia | 14,027 | 2.0 yr |
Full per-county tables: caseparity.com/explore
Virginia — Va. Code § 18.2-95 — Grand larceny
Virginia · 18.2-95 · 1995–2023 · 31 circuits
Statewide / all circuits
Statewide / all circuits — 5,764 cases
Across Statewide / all circuits, effective sentence averaged 12 mo (median 6 mo; half fall between 3 mo and 16 mo).
| Sentence type | Cases | Median | Average | Middle 50% | Most-common band |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effective sentence | 2,463 | 6 mo | 12 mo | 3 mo–16 mo | 6–12 mo (22%) |
Median, average, and the middle 50% are exact percentiles (PERCENTILE_CONT) over recorded lengths. Sentence lengths are capped per methodology; only cases with a recorded length are counted. Documented past outcomes — not a prediction about any case.
| circuit | Recorded cases | Median confinement (months) |
|---|---|---|
| Circuit 1 | 274 | 12 mo |
| Circuit 2 | 402 | 6 mo |
| Circuit 3 | 54 | 7 mo |
| Circuit 4 | 184 | 10 mo |
| Circuit 5 | 139 | 12 mo |
| Circuit 6 | 128 | 12 mo |
| Circuit 7 | 85 | 6 mo |
| Circuit 8 | 59 | 11 mo |
| Circuit 9 | 199 | 6 mo |
| Circuit 10 | 162 | 11 mo |
| Circuit 11 | 67 | 7 mo |
| Circuit 12 | 328 | 6 mo |
| Circuit 13 | 105 | 10 mo |
| Circuit 14 | 265 | 8 mo |
| Circuit 15 | 425 | 6 mo |
| Circuit 16 | 179 | 6 mo |
| Circuit 17 | 54 | 6 mo |
| Circuit 18 | 22 | 12 mo |
| Circuit 19 | 204 | 10 mo |
| Circuit 20 | 111 | 13 mo |
| Circuit 21 | 122 | 7 mo |
| Circuit 22 | 163 | 8 mo |
| Circuit 23 | 307 | 3 mo |
| Circuit 24 | 253 | 10 mo |
| Circuit 25 | 318 | 6 mo |
| Circuit 26 | 275 | 10 mo |
| Circuit 27 | 286 | 10 mo |
| Circuit 28 | 159 | 8 mo |
| Circuit 29 | 169 | 9 mo |
| Circuit 30 | 124 | 8 mo |
| Circuit 31 | 142 | 12 mo |
Full per-circuit tables: caseparity.com/explore
Harris County, Texas — Tex. H&S Code § 481.115 — Possession of Controlled Substance PG-1
Harris County, TX · TX.HSC.481.115 · 2010–2024 · 31 district courts
Harris County / all courts
Harris County / all courts — 134,721 cases
Across Harris County / all courts, county jail averaged 5 mo (median 4 mo; most commonly the 3–6-month band); state jail terms were longer (average 11 mo).
| Sentence type | Cases | Median | Average | Most-common band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State prison | 5,170 | 2.9 yr | 4.2 yr | 24–36 mo (56%) |
| County jail | 70,817 | 4 mo | 5 mo | 3–6 mo (29%) |
| State jail | 66,187 | 9 mo | 11 mo | 6–12 mo (61%) |
Median and average for pooled aggregates are interpolated from recorded length bands; per-unit figures use exact percentiles. Sentence lengths are capped per methodology; only cases with a recorded length are counted. Documented past outcomes — not a prediction about any case.
| district court | Recorded cases | Median confinement (months) |
|---|---|---|
| Court 006 | 1 | <1 mo |
| Court 015 | 1 | — |
| Court 174 | 5,827 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 176 | 5,886 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 177 | 6,117 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 178 | 6,066 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 179 | 6,258 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 180 | 5,731 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 182 | 5,685 | 3.0 yr |
| Court 183 | 6,025 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 184 | 6,197 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 185 | 6,008 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 208 | 5,684 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 209 | 5,901 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 228 | 6,159 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 230 | 5,986 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 232 | 5,864 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 248 | 5,869 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 262 | 5,944 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 263 | 5,861 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 337 | 6,209 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 338 | 6,144 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 339 | 5,781 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 351 | 5,992 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 482 | 1,186 | 2.0 yr |
| Court 486 | 471 | 5 mo |
| Court 487 | 430 | 3 mo |
| Court 488 | 549 | 3 mo |
| Court 495 | 346 | 2 mo |
| Court 496 | 266 | 3 mo |
| Court 497 | 277 | 8 mo |
Full per-district court tables: caseparity.com/explore
Cook County, Illinois — 720 ILCS 570/402(c) — Possession of a controlled substance
Cook County, IL · IL-720-570-402(C) · 2011–2024 · 204 judges
Cook County / all locations
Cook County / all locations — 95,338 cases
Across Cook County / all locations, state prison averaged 2.2 yr (median 20 mo; most commonly the 12–18-month band).
| Sentence type | Cases | Median | Average | Most-common band |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State prison | 14,190 | 20 mo | 2.2 yr | 12–18 mo (46%) |
Median and average for pooled aggregates are interpolated from recorded length bands; per-unit figures use exact percentiles. Sentence lengths are capped per methodology; only cases with a recorded length are counted. Documented past outcomes — not a prediction about any case.
| judge | Recorded cases | Median confinement (months) |
|---|---|---|
| 26TH Street | 22,280 | — |
| Bridgeview Courthouse | 2,073 | — |
| Skokie Courthouse | 1,821 | — |
| Markham Courthouse | 1,468 | — |
| Rolling Meadows Courthouse | 816 | — |
| Maywood Courthouse | 766 | — |
| Harrison & Kedzie (Area 4) | 3 | — |
Full per-judge and per-judge tables: caseparity.com/explore