Florida public records · 2018–2026 · Fla. Stat. § 817.625
What the public record shows for Use of scanning device, skimming device, or reencoder to defraud in Miami-Dade County
64 public records from Miami-Dade County were resolved between 2018 and 2026 with Fla. Stat. § 817.625 as the primary charge.
Florida Clerk of Courts data · Fla. Stat. § 900.05 · Primary charges only
Documented outcomes from past cases — not a prediction about any individual case. CaseParity is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.
Small sample (64 cases). The rates shown are based on a modest number of records and carry a wider margin of error than cells with 100+ cases. Interpret with appropriate caution.
How 64 Miami-Dade County Use of scanning device, skimming device, or reencoder to defraud cases were sentenced
The last row is not an error and it is not hidden. In 7 of these cases the Clerk of Courts record we received did not carry a sentencing category we could classify. Probation and dismissal are two dispositions that can fall into it: Florida’s published extract does not always separate them from other unclassified outcomes.
Adjudication withheld means the court did not enter a conviction. It is a sentencing outcome recorded in the public data; it is not the same as a dismissal.
What this page does not tell you
This free page does not publish sentence length; the full report does.
It does not tell you the individual facts of any one case — charge specifics, plea posture, and criminal history all affect a real sentence and none of them are in this aggregate.
What Fla. Stat. § 817.625 covers
A single statute subsection can carry more than one degree under Florida law, so we do not assert one severity for Fla. Stat. § 817.625 as a whole. If this statute in fact spans more than one degree, the rates above may pool cases across degrees.
How Miami-Dade County compares with the rest of Florida
Miami-Dade County’s state-prison rate for this charge is 64.1%. Across the 2 Florida counties with at least 30 recorded Fla. Stat. § 817.625 cases, the median is 32% and the full documented range runs from 0% to 64.1%. Miami-Dade ranks 1st of 2 from the highest.
Bar width = prison rate (0–100 %) · 2 Florida counties with ≥ 30 cases · 2018–2026
These are differences in the public record. They are not a ranking of courthouses, a judgment about any county, or a prediction about any individual case. Charge facts, plea posture, and case mix differ between counties and are not captured in aggregate records.
How this was measured
Source: Florida Clerk of Courts records published under Fla. Stat. § 900.05, anonymized, covering cases resolved between 2018 and 2026. Primary charges only — a case is counted once, under the charge the clerk recorded as primary.
Denominator: all 64 resolved Miami-Dade County cases with this primary charge. Percentages are shares of that number, not of convictions only.
Rate floor: we publish a percentage only where a county has at least 10 recorded cases for the charge. Below that we still publish the case count — we just do not turn it into a rate, because a percentage built on a handful of cases misleads.
The four named categories above cover 89.1% of these cases. We show the remaining 10.9% as its own row rather than leaving you to subtract. Coverage varies by charge and county across the site, and it is printed on every page.
The full report goes deeper
Statute text as of the offense date, version-aware sourcing, and the full outcome distribution — one report, verified against primary sources.
Get the full report →One-time purchase · price shown by charge severity before payment — never a surprise.
The statute
Read the current text of Fla. Stat. § 817.625 at flsenate.gov. Statutes are amended; check the version in effect on the offense date. Fla. Stat. § 817.625 at flsenate.gov →
Counties are listed by number of recorded cases, largest first.
Same charge, other Florida counties
Other charges in Miami-Dade County
CaseParity · Florida · Miami-Dade County · Fla. Stat. § 817.625
64.1%state-prison rate
64 public records (2018–2026) for Use of scanning device, skimming device, or reencoder to defraud as the primary charge in Miami-Dade County. One point in the documented range across 2 reporting Florida counties.
Source: Florida Clerk of Courts data under Fla. Stat. § 900.05 · documented outcomes from past cases, not a prediction
Shared posts carry their source and a note that CaseParity publishes public records — not legal advice.
Past sentencing patterns do not predict future outcomes in any individual case. CaseParity does not recommend litigation strategy, plea decisions, sentencing positions, or appellate arguments. Sentencing outcomes reflect many factors not captured in structured public records.
CaseParity is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Statistics are computed from anonymized public court records and describe historical patterns only. They do not predict outcomes in any individual case. Source: Florida Clerk of Courts under Fla. Stat. § 900.05. Primary charges only.