Skip to content
CaseParity

CarjackingFla. Stat. § 812.133

Criminal sentencing outcomes across 51 Florida counties, 1,365 charges recorded, 2018–2026.

What Fla. Stat. § 812.133 covers

Chapter 812 of the Florida Statutes — Theft, Robbery, and Related Crimes. A single statute can span several offences at different degrees, and the figures on this page pool every degree. No single rate here is the rate for any one degree.

How often did this charge end in state prison, by county?

Sorted alphabetically, never worst-first. Every rate below has one denominator and it is stated in the column heading: all charges recorded, not convictions. A rate computed on convictions would be higher, and mixing the two is why the same statute can appear to have different “worst counties” on different pages. Across the 20 counties with enough records to publish a rate, the median is 80.1%.

CountyCharges recordedState prison, per 100 charges recorded
Alachua County1163.6%
Bay County1090.0%
Broward County4774.5%
Duval County10383.5%
Escambia County3531.4%
Hernando County1369.2%
Hillsborough County11464.0%
Lake County13100.0%
Lee County1485.7%
Leon County4381.4%
Manatee County1392.3%
Marion County1492.9%
Miami-Dade County41668.7%
Orange County13473.1%
Osceola County1877.8%
Palm Beach County6678.8%
Pasco County3381.8%
Pinellas County5673.2%
Seminole County2592.0%
Volusia County7883.3%

Counties with too few records to publish a sentencing rate (31)

Fewer than 10 records each. The count is published; the rate is not.

Source, window and the n≥10 floor

Florida Clerk of Courts public records, under Fla. Stat. § 900.05. Window: 2018–2026. A sentencing rate is published for a county only where that county has at least 10 records for this charge. Percentages are weighted by case count. Where the categories on a county page sum to less than 100%, the remainder is a sentence not recorded in the public extract, and that county page names it.

The statute

Read Fla. Stat. § 812.133 at the source →

CaseParity takes no position on sentencing policy. We do not advocate for longer sentences or shorter ones. We do not favor any party, any side, or any outcome. We publish the record.

Past sentencing patterns do not predict future outcomes in any individual case. CaseParity does not recommend litigation strategy, plea decisions, sentencing positions, or appellate arguments. Sentencing outcomes reflect many factors not captured in structured public records.

CaseParity is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Documented past outcomes, reported in aggregate; not a prediction about any individual case. CaseParity never looks up individual cases.