Skip to content
CaseParity

Attempts, solicitation, and conspiracyFla. Stat. § 777.04

Criminal sentencing outcomes across 55 Florida counties, 860 charges recorded, 2018–2026.

What Fla. Stat. § 777.04 covers

Chapter 777 of the Florida Statutes — Principal; Accessory; Attempt; Solicitation; Conspiracy. A single statute can span several offences at different degrees, and the figures on this page pool every degree. No single rate here is the rate for any one degree.

How often did this charge end in state prison, by county?

Sorted alphabetically, never worst-first. Every rate below has one denominator and it is stated in the column heading: all charges recorded, not convictions. A rate computed on convictions would be higher, and mixing the two is why the same statute can appear to have different “worst counties” on different pages. Across the 22 counties with enough records to publish a rate, the median is 50.0%.

CountyCharges recordedState prison, per 100 charges recorded
Alachua County4783.0%
Charlotte County2450.0%
Clay County7862.8%
Desoto County1586.7%
Duval County7252.8%
Escambia County545.6%
Hardee County3253.1%
Leon County1442.9%
Levy County1861.1%
Manatee County1258.3%
Okaloosa County250.0%
Orange County1010.0%
Palm Beach County1526.7%
Pasco County6152.5%
Pinellas County13250.0%
Polk County120.0%
Santa Rosa County2330.4%
Seminole County1020.0%
Union County1782.4%
Volusia County4131.7%
Walton County1838.9%
Washington County1163.6%

Counties with too few records to publish a sentencing rate (33)

Fewer than 10 records each. The count is published; the rate is not.

Source, window and the n≥10 floor

Florida Clerk of Courts public records, under Fla. Stat. § 900.05. Window: 2018–2026. A sentencing rate is published for a county only where that county has at least 10 records for this charge. Percentages are weighted by case count. Where the categories on a county page sum to less than 100%, the remainder is a sentence not recorded in the public extract, and that county page names it.

The statute

Read Fla. Stat. § 777.04 at the source →

CaseParity takes no position on sentencing policy. We do not advocate for longer sentences or shorter ones. We do not favor any party, any side, or any outcome. We publish the record.

Past sentencing patterns do not predict future outcomes in any individual case. CaseParity does not recommend litigation strategy, plea decisions, sentencing positions, or appellate arguments. Sentencing outcomes reflect many factors not captured in structured public records.

CaseParity is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. Documented past outcomes, reported in aggregate; not a prediction about any individual case. CaseParity never looks up individual cases.